![]() |
Streaming Radio | ![]() |
Real Estate |
Mortgage |
Automotive |
Employment |
|
Classifieds |
|
Media Kit |
|
|||||
|
Scannapieco receives 21-month prison term MARLBORO - Matthew V. Scannapieco, who served as Marlboro's mayor from 1992 to 2003, was sentenced on June 20 to 21 months in federal prison for accepting bribes totaling approximately $245,000 from developer Anthony Spalliero, and for tax evasion, U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie announced. U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle, sitting in Camden, also fined Scannapieco $100,000. Simandle ordered Scannapieco to surrender to the federal Bureau of Prisons by Aug. 4 to begin serving his sentence. There is no parole in the federal system. Scannapieco, 56, pleaded guilty on April 12, 2005, to a two-count Information charging him with accepting corrupt payments and tax evasion. Scannapieco admitted that on numerous occasions from 1997 to 2003, he accepted cash payments from a developer - who was not identified in court at that time - for supporting the developer's projects as the mayor and a voting member of the Marlboro Planning Board. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Spalliero was subsequently indicted and pleaded guilty to bribery and tax evasion in December. Spalliero then admitted paying bribes to Scannapieco in exchange for Scannapieco's official assistance. Spalliero awaits sentencing in September. At Scannapieco's June 20 sentencing hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael A. Hammer said the government supported a sentence below the range recommended under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines because of Scannapieco's assistance in the investigation of others involved in corruption in Marlboro. Scannapieco's assistance led to investigations and guilty pleas from Spalliero and from Monmouth County developers Bernard Meiterman and Steven Meiterman, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Attorney Mitchell Ansell, who represented Scannapieco, said after the sentencing, "Both myself and my client are extremely grateful for the compassion the judge and the U.S. Attorney showed in this case. The court had a difficult balancing act in determining what was an appropriate sentence. They judge and the prosecutor are to be commended for their fairness." At his plea hearing, Scannapieco admitted receiving the following corrupt payments in exchange for his official action: • $25,000 in 1997, in exchange for supporting a Spalliero project on Texas Road; • $60,000 in 1997 and 1998, in exchange for supporting the rezoning of property south of Woodcliff Boulevard. • $25,000 in 1999, for working to settle a dispute between Spalliero and Marlboro regarding the developer's rights on Dutch Lane Road, Vanderburg Road and Pleasant Valley Road. • $100,000 in 2001 and 2002, for supporting rezoning property on and around the former Marlboro Airport site on Route 79. • $10,000 in 2001 or 2002, for persuading an elected state official to assist the developer in procuring an easement across a railroad line near Dutch Lane Road and Buckley Road. • $25,000 in 2002 and 2003, for supporting approvals to construct a large retail store at Route 9 and Route 520. In pleading guilty to tax evasion, Scannapieco admitted that he did not report to the IRS any of the bribe payments he received from the developer. Scannapieco, who is a certified public accountant and certified financial auditor, also admitted that he regularly purchased cashier's checks and postal money orders - in structured amounts and with cash to avoid federal cash transaction reports - and used the cashier's checks and money orders for personal expenses. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, in imposing the sentence, Simandle took into consideration Scannapieco's cooperation and consulted the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide appropriate sentencing ranges that take into account the severity and characteristics of the offense and other factors. The judge, however, was not bound by the advisory guidelines and exercised his discretion in determining the sentence. Parole has been abolished in the federal system. Defendants who are given custodial terms must serve nearly all that time. |
|
||||